|
|
|
Ten
Thousand Things
Multicultural Webfinds
"Ten
Thousand Things" is a Buddhist expression representing the dynamic
interconnection and simultaneous unity and diversity of everything in
the universe.
Pan-Indigenous
Dialogue: Ainu leader Tadashi Kato on the UN's 2007 Resolution on Indigenous
Rights
Most people don't realize that most (70%) of the world's 370 million indigenous
people live in the Asia/Pacific region, because indigenous people from
North and Latin America, Australia, and New Zealand have dominated global
discourse on indigenous issues. Also, the policies of many Asia/Pacific
nations have obscured the presence and suppressed the voices of their
indigenous populations.
International legal researcher Barbara Siee's article "Indigenous
peoples at the global level" and Gerard A. Persoon's "Indigenous
peoples and rights to resources in Asia" in the IIAS
(International Institute of Asian Studies) November 2004 newsletter
provides an excellent overview of the international discourse of indigenous
people. She notes that in past years, indigenous peoples have finally
become valued members in international community, and visionary leaders
in environmental, biodiversity, and human rights issues:
"Today indigenous representatives are active
and respected participants in the international debate in contrast to
some years ago when attention noticeably drifted off as another indigenous
representative pointed an accusing finger at the developed world to point
out the injustices they have suffered. Indigenous peoples have much to
offer in terms of norms and values respecting nature and its use...
"Since the 1980's, indigenous peoples have made advances in the human
rights arena. The UN Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
is probably the most progressive document on indigenous rights formulated
so far. It was passed by the UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations
and the UN Sub-Commission for the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection
of Minorities during the UN Year for Indigenous Peoples (1993)..."
Siee mentions several Asian nations that hesitated to support developments
that specify an important role for indigenous and local communities, citing
the Malaysian government which hindered this process in Montreal regarding
the AKWE:KON
Guidelines <> on the determination of and policies
towards indigenous sacred sites.
While indigenous people have gained a higher global profile than they
experienced the the past, The International Decade of Indigenous People,
an UN endeavor, is now in its second decade after the first decade, 1994-2004,
ended to
mixed reviews, according to the National Geographic:
" While indigenous issues are receiving more
political attention worldwide, observers say that most indigenous people
remain mired in poverty. Hunter-gatherer groups, in particular, are facing
persecution and attacks on their way of life.
"A lot of people only pay lip service to the indigenous issues,"
said Fiona Watson, a research and campaigns coordinator with Survival
International, a London-based human rights group. "Governments come
up with policies, but often those policies are not enforced."
" There are some 300 million indigenous people in over 70 countries
worldwide. They were the first known humans in their regions, from the
Amazon jungle to the Arctic. For centuries most lived isolated lives.
"Industrialization changed that, as millions of indigenous people
were forced off their land to make way for everything from farmland to
mines.
"Experts say that a loss of land is still the greatest challenge
to hunter-gatherers and other indigenous people."
Land rights and the reluctance to address past abuses, including ethnic
cleansing and genocide, continue to block genuine reconciliation between
surviving indigenous peoples and those who now populate their lands.
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States, all "settler
nations" in which European immigrants violently seized indigenous
territories, and instituted abusive policies against indigenous people
that some say continue to lesser extent to this day, voted against the
Declaration
on the Rights of Indigenous People. Eleven other nations
abstained: Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burundi, Colombia, Georgia,
Kenya, Nigeria, Russian Federation, Samoa, and the Ukraine. However, 143
countries voted overwhelming for the Declaration, adopted on September
13, 2007.
The Declaration addresses both individual and collective rights, cultural
rights and identity, rights to education, health, employment, and language.
It explicitly encourages cooperative relations between states and indigenous
Peoples. It prohibits discrimination against indigenous peoples and promotes
their full and effective participation in all matters that concern them.
Jennifer Brea at Global Voices has posted a fascinating collection
of responses from around the world.
Japan supported the Declaration, however, at the same time, Minister of
Foreign Affairs Nobutaka Machimura reiterated
the Japanese government's stance that it does not recognize the Ainu as
an indigenous people, a slippery take which allows Japan to align with
the high ground of the Declaration, but also to skirt the issue of its
own policies towards the Ainu people:
"Japan has not come to the conclusion that
the Ainu people are an indigenous people. One reason is because there
has yet to emerge a consensus from international discussions on how to
define what exactly is an indigenous people. Furthermore, because there
are many ministries and agencies involved and each of them has currently
expressed their respective views we are not currently in a position to
be able to state as a conclusion that the Ainu people are an indigenous
people."
Tadashi Kato, head of the Ainu Association of Hokkaido, responded in an
editorial at the Asahi Shimbun on October 3:
"Recognizing the rights of indigenous people
who have been deprived of their land and resources and whose ethnic identity
and cultures were denied in the process of forming modern states is now
a trend in international society. In the case of Japan, it must address
the problem of the Ainu people, forced to accept the government's policy
of assimilation since the Meiji Era (1868-1912).
"The Ainu Association of Hokkaido, the largest Ainu association,
has fought for rights as an indigenous people at every opportunity. For
example, at the inauguration ceremony to mark the International Year of
the World's Indigenous People in 1993 designated by the United Nations,
the then executive director of the association, Giichi Nomura, gave a
speech about the rights of indigenous people.
"But, to date, the Japanese government has refused to recognize the
Ainu as an indigenous people on grounds that the United Nations' definition
of indigenous peoples is vague.
"In 1997, the government abolished the 'Hokkaido former aborigine
protection law,' which was established in 1899 based on a philosophy of
assimilation. It was replaced with a law designed to promote the Ainu
culture. But the law failed to spell out concrete measures to rectify
disparities between the Ainu and the rest of Japanese society.
"Moreover, because of growing budget deficits, it has become increasingly
difficult to secure budgets for Ainu-related projects and the situation
is now in a critical state. Measures to promote education and employment
are not making progress as expected, either. In short, all the government
did was enact a law calling for the promotion of "Ainu culture."
"Meanwhile, in the Nibudani Dam case, in which the Ainu people sued
the government for expropriating and flooding their ancestral lands in
1997, the Sapporo District Court recognized the Ainu as an indigenous
people, citing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
to which Japan is also a party.
"Various United Nations organizations also continue to press Japan
to recognize the Ainu as an indigenous people.
"The United Nations General Assembly also adopted the Declaration
on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples on Sept. 13 with an overwhelming majority.
"The Japanese government should seize the opportunity to move ahead
and recognize the Ainu as an indigenous people. Moreover, I urge the government
to set up a council to deliberate various issues surrounding the Ainu.
The Ainu problem is also part of the issue of building an environment
and a basic framework of "human rights" in Japanese society.
"Recent historical research has revealed that during the Meiji Era,
the Japanese government positioned Hokkaido as a colony and treated the
Ainu who lived there as an indigenous people...
"Japan's policy of colonizing surrounding areas started with the
colonization of lands inhabited by the Ainu for generations. Admitting
this fact also leads to truly putting an end to Japan's past imperialism."
Keiji Hirano's October 13 "Ainu
hope UN move aids indigenous status quest" in the Japan
Times provides some more takes from Kato and background on how historical
discrimination has impacted the lives of contemporary Ainu:
..."We are not seeking the return of our land
or independence from Japan," the leader of the largest Ainu group
said. "We hope the government will apologize for depriving us of
our land, culture and language by recognizing us as indigenous people."
"Under the government's assimilation policies and a lack of consideration
for their ethnicity, the Ainu have led underprivileged lives...."
Hirano's article also mentions the issue of the Kuriles, along with Sakhalin
and the Aleutians, a centuries-old homeland of indigenous peoples, including
the Ainu, which is now in a land dispute between two nation states: Japan
and Russia (the imperial Russian and Soviet seizure of Asian lands and
oppression of indigenous peoples is one of the most horrifying chapters
in global mistreatment of indigenous peoples, legitimated by Russia's
version of its "civilizing mission" masking violence and abuse,
that parallels the histories of North America, Australia, New Zealand,
and northern Japan), and how Ainu leaders are attempting to establish
their rightful place in these discussions.
Previous
........... Next
Back to Ten
Thousand Things index page...
|
|